Following on from our blog post of 11/8/17, Another Asian sex gang, convicted and following the resignation of a Labour M.P. for writing an article in which she said she though there was a problem with Asian sex gangs in Britain, why exactly is it 'wrong' to say that?

We have lots of problems with foreign cultures in this country, not least we have created exemptions for them, allowed them to dictate to us, or simply turned a blind eye to things that people of other religions would simply not get away with.

But Asian men seeing women as a whole as inferior and in particular white women as 'trash', is indeed a problem in this country, as demonstrated by numerous cases whereby Asian gangs were exclusively responsible.

Therefore, quite why she felt the need to apologize for so called 'insensitive' wording, let alone resign, is bizarre and frankly, absurd.

W.J.J.

The Spanish Government says the 'issue' of the British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar, needs to be resolved.

Get with the program.
It was and is.

In 1713 it was ceded to the British, in 'perpetuity'.
And for the benefit of the backward, orange growing and donkey riding people in Spain, that basically means forever.

Deal with it.

W.J.J.

After gangs of Asian men were eventually convicted of sexually assaulted young, white girls in Rotherham and Rochdale amongst many other places, another gang of Asian men have been convicted in Newcastle, for the same thing.

Yet the authorities and news media bent over backwards to avoid stating the fact that the people convicted, were Asian men.
They even refused to acknowledge there was any racial element to these crimes; despite being challenged to at least recognize the ethnicity of the men, one idiot from the Council avoided any mention of the fact the convicted criminals were Asian and merely trotted out the usual p.c. line that perpetrators come 'from all communities'.
A pathetic line and denial which is clearly, absurd.

Imagine if you will for a moment that these attacks had been committed by white men, against young Asian girls.
There would be hell to pay.
Apart from the riots by Asian men, the authorities would be queuing up to condemn the crimes, state that they would not tolerate racism and the targeting of 'ethnic minorities' and would have no hesitation whatsoever, to point out the fact it was a problem amongst white men.
Yet we know that people who first referred to the problem of young girls being abused by organized gangs of Asian men, had been requested to remove the word 'Asian' from their reports.

What these p.c. liberals fail to understand is that in Asian culture, women are not seen as equals and do not command the same respect as men do.
That's simply a fact.
Asian men look down on women; subsequently, when they come here, naturally they treat the women here with the same disdain.
But worse still, western women are seen as 'easy', not least because of what is regarded as their undignified, revealing clothes.

But no doubt to say any of that would be 'racist', obviously.

Another example of where political correctness trying to sanitize and prevent any negative coverage of 'ethnic minorities', yet fall over themselves to point out and emphasise any misdemeanour at all, by white people.

It's 'coz I'm white, innit?

W.J.J.

Quite why all these liberal apologists think that appeasement is the way to go with problems and disagreements with other countries, is not clear.

However, what is clear throughout history, is that it doesn't work.

Whether it's the fat kid with the daft haircut in Korea, or the corrupt, ideas-above-their-station, arrogant foreign fools at the E.E.C. you have to come from a position of strength.
Bullies do not understand anything else and what's more, they only prey on the weak.

You have all these wishy-washy p.c. liberals saying we need to enter 'negotiations' with the E.E.C. in a respectful and polite manner, conceding ground in order to somehow curry favour with these fascist dictators.
They clearly have no idea how you negotiate.
The idea is you get something, for something.
And you have to draw a line and be serious and strong on that.

As we've said before, we should simply tell them to get stuffed and walk away.

Then you have all these weak, liberal tree huggers saying that President Trump is being threatening and his rhetoric is dangerous.
These people are clearly deluded, or retarded; or both.
Do they not realize that the leader of North Korea has publicly stated an intention to launch an unprovoked military attack on American Sovereign territory?
What exactly is the President of the United States supposed to say when a foreign country directly threatens his own country with a military attack?
I suppose these liberals think he should apologize and give them whatever they want.

He did exactly the right thing.
He confronted the bully with the daft haircut, head on, talked tough and more importantly, he meant what he said; what's more, Kim Jong Jim-Jam knew it.

Unbelievably, some woolly liberals accused President Trump of being the madman who was being threatening and escalating the threat of war.
Quite how they work that one out is bizarre.

As we've said before, the U.S. should just take the fat kid and his henchmen out.
Take the head off the snake and watch the people of North Korea rejoice.

These p.c. liberal apologists and do-gooders need to man up and get a grip on reality.

W.J.J.