So what exactly is this going to do?
Why do they not just interpret the figures, as most normal people with a brain do?
It simply means (proportionately), more black people have committed an offence for which the penalty is imprisonment and less have chosen to go to university.
We've heard it all before form the liberal P.C. Gaurdianista.
When figures showing the amount of pupils expelled from school had more black people than white, of course that meant there was a 'racist' policy reason to blame for this.
When in actual fact, again, most people with a brain simply interpreted the fact that more misconduct had been perpetrated by black pupils than white pupils which had led to the total expelled.
Are we suggesting that if figures ever came out for crime, health or education failures with all white people on them, that we would need to campaign to get black people on it?
Are we saying we need to expel and imprison more white people to balance the figures?
We've touched on this insidious, politically correct notion that jobs and figures should represent the make-up of the population before; the awkward truth about it and demonstrated how absurd it is.
(See blog P.C. B.B.C 11/11/15 and Women in Frontline Combat 23/12/15)
The most obvious starting point for this waste of time investigation, is that Dave had to appoint a black man of course.
His reasoning for that, like all the other liberal zealots, is that you can't have white people investigating something that concerns black people.
No doubt David Lammy will find there is 'racism' to blame.