And why exactly would that be?
Just what exactly, is wrong with arguing for little or no immigration?
Or indeed for that matter, what's wrong with arguing that the British nation needs to be in control of immigration?
A perfectly legitimate, eminently sensible, widely held and easily understandable view to hold and indeed, subsequently therefore campaign for.
And if people agree, then they can vote for anyone who has that view.
It's called democracy and free speech.
A concept which the loony left and p.c. liberals alike despise and would abolish for sure, if they got half a chance.
Purely in the name of 'equality', obviously.
Sounds suspiciously like yet another fully paid up member of the wealthy, p.c. liberal elite, who apparently think they know what's best.
What's best for everyone else that is though, of course.
Somebody call the thought Police.