So much so now, it appears as a default position.
Without any evidence whatsoever, they feel obliged to blindly follow what everyone else simply asserts.
They say things like, they (immigrants) come her to 'help' and contribute to Britain; they only talk in glowing terms about immigration and immigrants, legal or not, almost as though no ill can ever be spoke of them or the subject.
This absurd practice, indeed obsession, of prefacing any and every conversation about immigration only in a positive way, is another manifestation of the self-imposed, guilt ridden bleeding heart liberal desire to demonstrate anti-racism credentials, with the notion that 'I'm not racist because I have a friend who is black', disclaimer.
And of course is solely because they fear that by not championing foreigners vigorously enough, the p.c. zealots will inevitably and equally absurdly, brand them 'racist'.
But of course, in reality people don't come here to help us, they come her to help themselves (see blog, Who contributes to who? 12/2/16, Benefit to Eastern European and illegal immigrants, except Britain 18/2/16).
This gallant but disingenuous effort of pretence that immigrants somehow feel the need to travel to Britain to help with any of her socio-economic problems, is sheer wishful thinking and frankly, pure fantasy.
Anyway, we have no such qualms about qualifying or prefacing what we say about immigration, or anything else for that matter.
Unlimited immigration has ruined Britain and brought her to her knees.
Reference any index measurement you like, be it health, housing or Schools; they're all at breaking point.
Ask yourself this.
How can anyone with nothing who comes to a country, possibly contribute to that country?
They can only ever possibly take from that society.
If someone who was destitute married someone who was wealthy, who do you think would benefit the most?
It's not rocket science.
And it's no good just saying immigrants have jobs and therefore contribute, because that's simply a job that someone who was already here could have done without the liability of another person burdening the taxpayer with public services.
It's simple arithmetical fact and anyone who thinks different is either delusional or quite simply, retarded.