Every time someone speaks some common sense, there is always some woolly liberal or 'equality' pressure group that will condemn it.
And every time some wishy-washy liberal comes out with the usual guff about something being 'racist' or 'sexist' and extolls the delusional, imaginary virtues of 'diversity' in order to cloud the truth or distort what was actually said; typically by ignoring the context in which it was said or done, then common sense will prevail.
Or at least, prevail in the minds of people who have their own mind and by definition, are therefore able to retain some degree of common sense, that is.
Take the recent furore about the remarks a female judge made about a rape victim.
All the judge said was that women who get really drunk make themselves more vulnerable, thus putting themselves at a higher risk of being susceptible to an attack and therefore, as a result obviously in more danger than someone who is sober.
Now common sense would tell you that is probably right.
And the more you think about it, the more you realize it is indeed, an accurate assessment of the situation.
The fact that any lone female is vulnerable to attack, though especially so late at night, then also by definition of the fact she is intoxicated, logic would dictate she is at more risk.
After all, allegedly, being drunk is now deemed to be so debilitating for a woman, that she is seen as unable to make even the simplest of decisions, such as giving sexual consent.
The ardent feminist fanatics appear to be arguing for special treatment for when they are drunk in one breath, only to deny being drunk should make any difference in their next breath.
Talk about clueless.
That just exposes the usual hypocritical nature of their position which of course, simply follows the fact it's usually a nonsensical position they start from.
However, as you can imagine, the hairy-arsed, 'burn your bra' brigade are up in arms about the judges' comments.
Apparently, they are 'sexist' and the female judge should have known better.
Well, no, not really.
The fact a female judge said it, simply shows that she has got some common sense and interestingly therefore, that common sense it is not just a phenomena exclusive to men.
And quite frankly, it's a good job some women do have common sense, not least a judge; indeed you would expect a judge to have copious amounts of it.
Evidently, being a judge would also denote that she is a well read, balanced and a learned character.
Let's look at this laterally and think for a minute.
Let's imagine for example that someone, anyone, let alone a female, gave some advice or warned against the idea of waving a wallet full of money about late at night, on your own in the street, as you would run a much higher risk of the danger of being mugged than if you kept it out of sight in your pocket.
Now, not only would common sense dictate that was wise, but anyone who possessed an ounce of it, would undoubtedly and indeed, quite naturally think that to be eminently sensible advice.
Of course, we know that in an ideal world a woman should be able to walk down the street naked and no one would touch or attack her.
Much in the same way you should be able to leave your car unlocked.
But alas, as everybody, or at least anyone with any common sense knows that is, you can't.
Or rather you can, but by doing so you are obviously making your car more vulnerable and therefore, by definition, at a higher risk of being stolen.
It's not rocket science.
It's simply common sense.
But of course, that's something that all these p.c. liberals have in common; not only do they not have any, but they despise it; it is the biggest single personal attribute that can be employed to expose the inherently flawed position, of the idealistically discriminatory, p.c. dogma which they espouse.
They also share a lack of a sense of humour, being seemingly unable to distinguish between reality and a joke.
Hence, they take offence at everything.
A case in point being the current band wagon they've jumped on, moaning about the so obviously light-hearted article in the Daily Mail, about the Prime Minister and the SNP leaders' legs.
Although even we had an objection to such awful pairs of legs on the front of a newspaper, it shows that the woman who wrote the article, does have a sense of humour and that indeed, that is also a characteristic not only exclusive to men.
All of the faux 'sexist' outrage generated by both of these stories, merely serve to illustrate the pathetic nature and sheer absurdity of the Mrs. ‘Mili-Tants’, of the ‘equality’ brigade.
And in reality, just how daft these liberals actually are, really.
After all, there they are propagating their feeble notion that you can only portray a woman in a positive, successful or professional way and no one is listening.
Most people have filtered this ideology through a large dose of common sense and simply pity them and their tiny, brainwashed minds, as they mindlessly repeat the usual sanctimonious drivel which emanates from the p.c. brigade.
Anyway, somewhat notably, women were responsible for both the comments and article they are getting hysterical about, quite how any of it can be described as ‘sexist’, is therefore beyond all reason.
Oh and common sense, naturally.