That’s much the same as their view on election and referendum results; they’re fine.
Again, so long as within their view they find the candidate is ‘acceptable’, or indeed the get the answer they agree with.
And of course if not, then in true libertarian fashion and tradition of free speech, ban them, censor it, or demand another referendum.
Of course, in common with all the other self-appointed, self-righteous guardians and advocates of ‘diversity’ and ‘equality’, the irony of their own intolerance, eludes them.
No doubt, the parallels with the great dictators of modern political history in banning publications and speech they didn't agree or approve of, is also beyond them.
As we have noted before, you can only discuss an issue or air a view, so long as it is within the boundaries of the tunnel vision of the p.c. liberal, control freak, censorship fascists.
Viewed through their perverse prism of 'diversity' and 'tolerance', they think you shouldn't be allowed to say or do anything, unless they agree with it of course.